2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and trials, jointly supported by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR. METHODS: This international multidisciplinary initiative included 4 phases: 1) Phase I, criteria generation by surveys and literature review; 2) Phase II, criteria reduction by modified Delphi and nominal group technique exercises; 3) Phase III, criteria definition, further reduction with the guidance of real-world patient scenarios, and weighting via consensus-based multicriteria decision analysis, and threshold identification; and 4) Phase IV, validation using independent adjudicators' consensus as the gold standard. RESULTS: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria include an entry criterion of at least one positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) test within 3 years of identification of an aPL-associated clinical criterion, followed by additive weighted criteria (score range 1-7 points each) clustered into 6 clinical domains (macrovascular venous thromboembolism, macrovascular arterial thrombosis, microvascular, obstetric, cardiac valve, and hematologic) and 2 laboratory domains (lupus anticoagulant functional coagulation assays, and solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for IgG/IgM anticardiolipin and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2 -glycoprotein I antibodies). Patients accumulating at least 3 points each from the clinical and laboratory domains are classified as having APS. In the validation cohort, the new APS criteria versus the 2006 revised Sapporo classification criteria had a specificity of 99% versus 86%, and a sensitivity of 84% versus 99%. CONCLUSION: These new ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary international input. Hierarchically clustered, weighted, and risk-stratified criteria reflect the current thinking about APS, providing high specificity and a strong foundation for future APS research.

authors

  • Barbhaiya, Medha
  • Zuily, Stephane
  • Naden, Ray
  • Hendry, Alison
  • Manneville, Florian
  • Amigo, Mary-Carmen
  • Amoura, Zahir
  • Andrade, Danieli
  • Andreoli, Laura
  • Artim-Esen, Bahar
  • Atsumi, Tatsuya
  • Avcin, Tadej
  • Belmont, Michael H
  • Bertolaccini, Maria Laura
  • Branch, D Ware
  • Carvalheiras, Graziela
  • Casini, Alessandro
  • Cervera, Ricard
  • Cohen, Hannah
  • Costedoat-Chalumeau, Nathalie
  • Crowther, Mark
  • de Jesus, Guilherme
  • Delluc, Aurelien
  • Desai, Sheetal
  • DeSancho, Maria Teresa
  • Devreese, Katrien M
  • Diz-Kucukkaya, Reyhan
  • Duarte-Garcia, Ali
  • Frances, Camille
  • Garcia, David
  • Gris, Jean-Christophe
  • Jordan, Natasha
  • Leaf, Rebecca K
  • Kello, Nina
  • Knight, Jason S
  • Laskin, Carl
  • Lee, Alfred I
  • Legault, Kimberly
  • Levine, Steve R
  • Levy, Roger A
  • Limper, Maarten
  • Lockshin, Michael D
  • Mayer-Pickel, Karoline
  • Musial, Jack
  • Meroni, Pier Luigi
  • Orsolini, Giovanni
  • Ortel, Thomas L
  • Pengo, Vittorio
  • Petri, Michelle
  • Pons-Estel, Guillermo
  • Gomez-Puerta, Jose A
  • Raimboug, Quentin
  • Roubey, Robert
  • Sanna, Giovanni
  • Seshan, Surya V
  • Sciascia, Savino
  • Tektonidou, Maria G
  • Tincani, Angela
  • Wahl, Denis
  • Willis, Rohan
  • Yelnik, Cecile
  • Zuily, Catherine
  • Guillemin, Francis
  • Costenbader, Karen
  • Erkan, Doruk

publication date

  • August 28, 2023

Research

keywords

  • Antiphospholipid Syndrome
  • Rheumatology

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85162769660

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1002/art.42624

PubMed ID

  • 37635643

Additional Document Info