Ultrasound assessment of synovitis in total knee replacements: concordance with MR imaging and joint aspiration.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if diagnostic ultrasound can reliably distinguish between synovial patterns of prosthetic joint infection and polymeric wear in total knee replacements. METHODS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our hospital IRB. Using the radiology report database, MR examinations performed within a week of diagnostic ultrasound and/or ultrasound-guided aspiration were identified. This yielded (1) 24 cases with MR and ultrasound comparisons; (2) 44 cases with MR, ultrasound, and aspiration comparisons; and (3) 92 cases with ultrasound and aspiration comparisons. The MR studies were reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. The ultrasound studies were each reviewed by 2 other musculoskeletal radiologists. Each study was graded for synovial pattern indicating infection, polymeric wear, or normal/nonspecific. Agreement between the MR grader and the ultrasound graders as well as ultrasound inter-rater agreement were assessed using k statistics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ultrasound were calculated. RESULTS: Agreement between ultrasound and MR imaging was fair to moderate: k of 0.27 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.50) and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.65) for ultrasound raters 1 and 2, respectively. Inter-rater agreement between ultrasound graders 1 and 2 was moderate, with k of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.70). Ultrasound sensitivities for infection were 0.13 and 0.09, while specificities were 0.94 and 0.98. Ultrasound sensitivities for polymeric wear were 0.38 and 0.62 with specificities of 0.90 and 0.76. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound does not perform well in distinguishing patterns of synovitis either compared to MRI or a reference standard of aspiration/clinical follow-up.
