Impact of Wiberg Patellar Type on Outcomes and Survival Following Cell-Based Cartilage Repair for Patellar Chondral Lesions at Midterm Follow-up.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: Cell-based cartilage repair procedures of the patellofemoral joint have less reliable outcomes than those of the tibiofemoral joint. No previous studies have evaluated the influence of patellar shape on cell-based cartilage repair outcomes. Patellar dysplasia may predispose patients to worse outcomes after cell-based cartilage repair. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between Wiberg patellar type and outcomes after cell-based cartilage repair (autologous chondrocyte implantation or particulated juvenile allograft cartilage transplantation) for the treatment of patellar chondral lesions at a minimum 2-year follow-up. It was hypothesized that Wiberg classification of patellar shape would have no effect on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or graft survival. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients undergoing autologous chondrocyte implantation or particulated juvenile allograft cartilage transplantation for full-thickness patellar chondral defects between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed after institutional review board approval. The change in PROMs, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Kujala, and Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey Mental and Physical scores, from pre- to postoperatively and the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for IKDC and Kujala scores were compared for the Wiberg type A versus Wiberg type B versus Wiberg type C groups. The log-rank test was used to evaluate for differences in survival between subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients (63 knees) were included, with a mean age of 33.3 ± 8.6 years, median body mass index of 26.0 (IQR, 21.8-30.2), and median follow-up time of 3.5 years (IQR, 2.6-4.2 years). In total, 26 (41%) patellae were Wiberg type A, 29 (46%) were Wiberg type B, and 8 (13%) were Wiberg type C. There were no differences between Wiberg type A versus Wiberg type B versus Wiberg type C groups with respect to change in PROMs from pre- to postoperatively or the percentage of patients who achieved the MCID for IKDC or Kujala scores (P > .05 for all). There were no differences in survival between groups (P = .45). CONCLUSION: Wiberg patellar type has no effect on patient-reported outcomes or graft survival at midterm follow-up. Patellar dysplasia should not be seen as a contraindication for cell-based cartilage repair procedures.
