Controlled mobilization of patients undergoing reconstructive spinal surgery: preliminary comparison of the kinetic therapy table vs the Foster frame.

Overview

Controlled mobilization is necessary in certain situations during the management of patients undergoing reconstructive spinal surgery. Chart review of 39 patients (20 maintained on the Roto-rest bed, 19 maintained on the Foster frame) was undertaken. Both beds protected spinal stability and no delays occurred in any staged surgical procedure. Patients maintained on the Roto-rest bed did have a significantly higher incidence of skin problems (p less than .05), but had no pulmonary emboli. Pulmonary emboli occurred in two of the 19 patients maintained on the Foster frame. Successful use of the Roto-rest bed was dependent upon skilled nursing personnel who were knowledgeable in the mechanical aspects of the bed and could provide a sense of security for the patient. No evidence was found that the Roto-rest bed affected the patients' use of postoperative analgesics. Both beds provided adequate controlled mobilization. Consideration of the patients' total medical profile would determine the choice of bed.