Effect of Specimen Extraction Site on Postoperative Incisional Hernia After Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy.

Overview

abstract

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia (IH) is a known complication after colorectal surgery. Despite advances in minimally invasive surgery, colorectal surgery still requires extraction sites for specimen retrieval, increasing the likelihood of postoperative IH development.The objective of this study is to determine the effect of specimen extraction site on the rate of IH after minimally invasive right-sided colectomy for patients with available imaging. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study at 2 large academic medical centers in the US. Adults who underwent right-sided minimally invasive colectomy from 2012-2020 with abdominal imaging available at least 1 year postoperatively were included in the analysis. The primary exposure was specimen extraction via a midline specimen extraction vs Pfannenstiel specimen extraction. The main outcome was the development of IH at least 1 year postoperatively as visualized on CT scan. RESULTS: Of the 341 patients sampled, 194 (57%) had midline specimen extraction and 147 (43%) had a Pfannenstiel specimen extraction. Midline extraction patients were older (66 ± 15 vs 58 ± 16; P<0.001) and had a higher rate of previous abdominal operation (99, 51% vs 55, 37%, P=0.01). The rate of IH was higher in midline extraction at 25% (n=48) compared with Pfannenstiel extraction (n=0, 0%) (P<0.001). The average length of stay was higher in the midline extraction group at 5.1±2.5 compared with 3.4±3.1 days in the Pfannenstiel extraction group (P<0.001). Midline extraction was associated with IH development (OR: 24.6; 95% CI 1.89-319.44; p=0.004). Extracorporeal anastomosis was associated with a higher IH rate (OR: 25.8; 95% CI 2.10-325.71; P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo Pfannenstiel specimen extraction have a lower risk of IH development compared with those who undergo midline specimen extraction.