Discrepancies in recommendations for return to regular activities after cervical spine surgery: A survey study. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: The recommended timing for returning to common activities after cervical spine surgery varies widely among physicians based on training background and personal opinion, without clear guidelines or consensus. The purpose of this study was to analyze spine surgeons' responses about the recommended timing for returning to common activities after different cervical spine procedures. METHODS: This was a survey study including 91 spine surgeons. The participants were asked to complete an anonymous online survey. Questions regarding their recommended time for returning to regular activities (showering, driving, biking, running, swimming, sedentary work, and nonsedentary work) after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc replacement (CDR), posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), and laminoplasty were included. Comparisons of recommended times for return to activities after each surgical procedure were made based on surgeons' years in practice. RESULTS: For ACDF and PCDF, there were no statistically significant differences in recommended times for return to any activity when stratified by years in practice. When considering CDR, return to non-sedentary work differed between surgeons in practice for 10 to 15 years, who recommended return at 3 months, and all other groups of surgeons, who recommended 6 weeks. Laminoplasty surgery yielded the most variability in activity recommendations, with earlier recommended return (6 weeks) to biking, non-sedentary work, and sedentary work in the most experienced surgeon group (>15 years in practice) than in all other surgeon experience groups (3 months). CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant variability in surgeon recommendations for return to regular activities after cervical spine surgery.

publication date

  • February 23, 2024

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC10987327

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85188991663

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100316

PubMed ID

  • 38572467

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 18