Efficacy and safety of catheter-based thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Data comparing catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in acute pulmonary embolism are lacking. To address this, we performed a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies of CBT and compared it to performance goal rates of mortality and major bleeding from a recently published network meta-analysis. When compared with performance goal for CDT based on historical studies, CBT was noninferior for all-cause mortality (6.0% vs 6.87%; P-valueNI < .001), non-inferior and superior for major bleeding (4.9% vs 11%; P-valueNI < .001 and P < .001 for superiority).

authors

  • Zhang, Robert
  • Maqsood, Muhammad H
  • Greco, Allison A
  • Postelnicu, Radu
  • Mukherjee, Vikramjit
  • Alviar, Carlos L
  • Bangalore, Sripal

publication date

  • April 17, 2024

Research

keywords

  • Pulmonary Embolism
  • Thrombectomy
  • Thrombolytic Therapy

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85191778663

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.009

PubMed ID

  • 38705637

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 272