Interstitial Lung Disease Patients' Global Impressions of Symptoms, Severity Ratings, and Meaningfulness of Changes Over Time. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • RATIONALE: In interstitial lung disease (ILD), symptoms drive impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) can assess whether interventions change symptom severity. The meaningfulness of change in a PRO's score is estimated by anchoring it to a related variable for which meaningful change has been previously established. Patient global impressions of severity (PGIS) are single item PROs that may make trustworthy anchors, but for ILD, the meaningfulness of change in PGIS items for shortness of breath, cough, and fatigue/low energy are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To improve understanding of how patients with ILD rate and categorize symptoms; how differing levels of symptom severity affect lived experiences; and how patients derive and apply meaningfulness to change in symptoms. METHODS: We used one-on-one interviews and an electronic survey to collect data from patients with various forms of ILD. Interviews were conducted to provide richness and context to survey responses. We conducted certain analyses with respondents stratified by oxygen use. RESULTS: Interviewees (N=18) confirmed shortness of breath (SOB), cough and fatigue/low energy are the most bothersome symptoms of ILD. Among 298 survey respondents, on a PGIS for SOB with a 0 to 4 numeric rating scale, on average, those who used O2 had more severe SOB than non-users, and most respondents considered a 2-point change meaningful for worsening (45.5%) or improvement (47.2%). On a PGIS with a 5-option ordinal response scale, for SOB, most considered a 1-category change meaningful for worsening (49.8%) and a 2-category change meaningful for improvement (42.3); for cough frequency, most respondents considered a 1-category change on the 5-option ordinal response scale meaningful for worsening (48.2%) or improvement (45.0%). Survey responses for how SOB is now compared to 3 months ago (patient global impressions of change or PGIC) were biased toward the present state. CONCLUSIONS: PGIS's can be used as anchors for meaningful change analyses of PRO's that assess SOB or cough in patients with ILD. PGIC's demonstrate present state bias and should not be used. Patients' descriptions paint a vivid picture of lived experience with varying levels of symptom severity and can help contextualize change scores.

publication date

  • August 12, 2024

Research

keywords

  • Cough
  • Dyspnea
  • Lung Diseases, Interstitial
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Quality of Life
  • Severity of Illness Index

Identity

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202405-457OC

PubMed ID

  • 39133575