Variability in Liver Size Measurements Using Different View Angles in Ultrasound Imaging.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare liver size measurements in different conventional B-mode ultrasound image (US) field views using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement as a reference. METHODS: After receiving Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, three operators measured the largest sagittal and transverse dimensions of adult livers on three US image field views (90°, 120°, and 140°) with a single curvilinear transducer. We analyzed the differences in liver size across three image field views using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and examined the correlations between MRI and ultrasound measurements using Spearman regression. We used 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (95% LOA) to analyze the confidence interval for liver size measurements between MRI and US. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in measuring liver size were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Based on sagittal liver length, 28 adult participants (7 men and 21 women, mean age 43 years) were divided into Group 1 (<17 cm, n = 10) or Group 2 (≥17 cm, n = 18). There was a significant difference in the liver size measurements across the three image field views (P < .001) in both groups. The highest correlation in liver size measurements between MRI and US was with ultra-wide-view (R2 = .87 in sagittal; R2 = .79 in transverse). Bland-Altman LOA also indicated good agreement between MRI and ultra-wide-view measurements. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in measuring liver size were good (ICC = 0.82-0.98). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that ultrasound ultra-wide-view provides the most accurate liver size measurement and good intra- and inter-operator reliability.
