Interpersonal problems as a predictor of treatment outcome in adult depression: An individual participant data meta-analysis.
Review
Overview
abstract
OBJECTIVES: Interpersonal problems are a fundamental feature of depression, but study-level meta-analyses of their association with treatment outcome have been limited by heterogeneity in primary studies' analyses and reported results. We conducted a pre-registered individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) to examine this relationship for adult depression. This meta-analytic strategy can reduce variability by standardizing data analysis across primary studies. METHODS: We included studies examining the efficacy of five treatments for adult depression and assessing interpersonal problems at baseline. One-stage IPD-MA was conducted with three-level mixed models to determine whether baseline overall interpersonal distress, agency, and communion predicted depressive symptom level at post-treatment, 12-month, and 24-month follow-up. The moderating effect of treatment type was also investigated. RESULTS: Ten studies (including n = 1282 participants) met inclusion criteria. Only overall interpersonal distress was negatively related with outcomes at post-treatment (γ = 0.11, CI95[0.06, 0.16], r = 0.11), 12-month follow-up (γ = 0.17, CI95[0.08, 0.25], r = 0.17), and 24-month follow-up (γ = 0.16, CI95[0.05, 0.26], r = 0.16), indicative of smaller effect sizes. The agency and communion dimensions were not significantly related to outcome. Treatment type did not significantly moderate interpersonal distress-outcome associations. DISCUSSION: Results show a small association between patient baseline overall interpersonal distress and subsequent depression treatment outcome in brief treatments for depression. Further studies might require to account for therapist effects. Registration number osf.io/u46t7.
