The effect of acetabular shell and liner design on posterior horizontal dislocation distance in modern dual-mobility implants. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: The posterior horizontal dislocation distance (PHDD) is a 3-dimensional jump distance measurement that is relevant to the risk of dislocation. There are a number of dual-mobility (DM) constructs with varying designs available. The present study identifies design factors associated with increased PHDD and evaluates the PHDD of 3 DM implants. METHODS: 3 different computer-aided implant designs were virtually implanted within a 3-dimensional CT-derived pelvic model. Each design represented an analogue of a DM system (MDM, OR3O, and G7) according to specific variations in acetabular liner rim build-up and femoral head centre location. The effective head diameters and PHDD values were calculated for each size acetabular shell and DM design. RESULTS: The positive rim build-up design (MDM) showed higher PHDD values as compared to the other 2 hemispherical rim designs with no build-up, across all studied shell sizes. Specifically, the MDM design analogue had 16.4-29.0% greater PHDD values than the OR3O design analog and 15.2-30.5% greater PHDD values than the G7 design analogue The effect of a sfemoral head centre location relative to the liner head centre (OR3O) was negated by a larger effective head diameter to shell diameter ratio of the G7 design, resulting in similar PHDD values. CONCLUSIONS: Design parameters affect the PHDD values of DM cups. The use of an elevated rim was associated with greater PHDD values. A medialised femoral head centre should also improve PHDD values, but the effect was nullified due to consecutive lower effective head diameters.

publication date

  • April 1, 2025

Research

keywords

  • Acetabulum
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
  • Hip Dislocation
  • Hip Prosthesis
  • Prosthesis Design

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 105002058850

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1177/11207000251329269

PubMed ID

  • 40170409

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 35

issue

  • 3