Financial toxicity amongst cancer patients and survivors: a comparative study of the United Kingdom and United States.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: The study investigated the experiences of financial toxicity (FT) amongst cancer patients/survivors in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (USA/US). METHODS: Six hundred cancer patients/survivors residing in the UK (n = 319) or USA/US (n = 281) completed an online cross-sectional survey using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST)-a validated measure of FT. Severity of FT was defined as 'no' (COST scores ≥ 26), 'mild' (14-25), and 'moderate/severe' (0-13). RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of UK participants faced FT which was significantly lower compared to the USA/US at 55% (crude OR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.73-3.42). An ordered logistic regression model showed that in the USA/US, being 65 + years old (adjusted OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.48), retired (aOR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.75), and having a higher household income (aOR ranged 0.03-0.19) decreased the risk of FT, whilst being female increased the risk (aOR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.01-3.32). In the UK, age and sex did not have an effect, but higher income and being retired showed an identical pattern compared to the US. CONCLUSIONS: FT was less prevalent and less severe in the UK, compared to the USA/US. The high prevalence of FT underscores the need to provide an additional level of protection to the most vulnerable groups than is currently offered in either country.
