A Clinician's Guide to Ethical Challenges in Discharge Planning: Proportionality, Risk, and Justice.
Review
Overview
abstract
Discharge planning often presents clinicians with ethical dilemmas. Because most clinicians lack formal training in ethics or have limited access to ethics consultation, we propose a pragmatic framework to address them. Our recommendations are based on a review of PubMed articles on ethics and adult inpatient discharge planning from January 2000 to May 2025. Ethical challenges can be categorized into two principal types: autonomy-related challenges, which arise when patients reject the clinical team's recommendations for safe discharge, and distributive justice-related challenges, which occur when resource allocation constraints affect discharge planning. Possible solutions emerge when applying the principle of proportionality to find a correct balance between the competing ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Such balance is inherently subjective, context-dependent, and arrived at through shared, deliberative decision-making. Finding proportionate balance is also error-prone, requiring continual reassessment through a reflective process that recognizes biases from healthcare policy and economic drivers.
