Developing and validating machine learning models to predict acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • AIMS: Adequate implant inventory management can improve efficiency, storage space, and result in cost savings in arthroplasty. This study investigates if the prediction of cup size in elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cound be improved with the use of advanced machine learning. METHODS: Using the arthroplasty registry of a single institution, we identified 30,583 patients who underwent primary THA between 2016 and 2024. No data was missing or incomplete. A total of 9 parameters readily available preoperatively were included as potential predictor variables. The data corpus was partitioned into training (80 %) and hold-out test (20 %) samples. Two distinct machine learning models were trained on regression tasks. The models were technically evaluated utilizing Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to assess alignment with implanted cup. 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated via bootstrapping. Real world useability was assessed by the percent of correct predictions within ±2 mm from implanted cup. RESULTS: The quantile regression forest outperformed the explainable boosted machine (EBM) in terms of MAE (1.69 [95 % CI 1.64, 1.73] vs 1.73 [1.69, 1.77]) and real-world usability, with an accuracy of 82.85 % within ±2 mm and 97.27 % within ±4 mm. The EBM outperformed the QRF by RMSE and Spearman Correlation coefficient, weighing outliers heavier. The most important factors in order were Sex, height, age, weight, surgical approach and BMI. CONCLUSION: Machine learning models can predict implant sizing with very high accuracy based on a few metrics available preoperatively. This model can help decrease overall cost of THA by improving orthopaedic manufacturers' supply chains and hospitals' inventory management.

publication date

  • July 23, 2025

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC12312115

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 105011398259

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jor.2025.07.021

PubMed ID

  • 40755483

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 67