Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet treatment for secondary stroke prevention in patients with active cancer.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 5-10% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known active cancer. These patients are at high risk for both recurrent AIS and major bleeding. The optimal antithrombotic strategy for cancer-related stroke is uncertain. This study compared clinical outcomes among patients with cancer-related stroke treated with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. METHODS: We identified consecutive patients with AIS and active cancer hospitalized at our comprehensive stroke center from 2015 through 2020. Patients with cardioembolic mechanisms were excluded. We used Cox regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to evaluate the associations between type of antithrombotic therapy at discharge (anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy) and the main outcomes of 1-year mortality and long-term recurrent AIS. RESULTS: Among 5,012 AIS patients, 306 had active cancer. After applying study eligibility criteria, we analyzed 135 patients (median age 72 years; 44% women), of whom 58 (43%) were treated with anticoagulant and 77 (57%) with antiplatelet therapy. The median follow-up time was 495 days (IQR, 57-1,029). Patients treated with anticoagulants, compared to patients treated with antiplatelet therapy, were younger (median 69 versus 75 years), had more metastatic disease (72% versus 41%), and higher median baseline D-dimer levels (median 8,536 μg/L versus 1,010 μg/L). Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy was associated with similar risks of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.63) and long-term recurrent AIS (aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.08-2.83). The IPTW analyses for 1-year mortality confirmed the results of the main analyses (HR 0.82; 95%CI: 0.39-1.72, p = 0.61). CONCLUSION: Factors associated with anticoagulant use in patients with cancer-related stroke include younger age, more advanced cancer, and elevated D-dimer. Similar outcomes were seen with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these patients highlighting the need for future randomized trials to determine the preferred antithrombotic strategy.
