Venoactive drugs for venous origin chronic pelvic pain in women: A systematic review.
Review
Overview
abstract
BackgroundThis review evaluates the current evidence for the role of venoactive drugs (VADs) for venous origin chronic pelvic pain (VO-CPP) and provide insights to inform the design of an ideal randomized controlled trial (RCT) for future research.MethodsA search was performed in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Studies retrieved were screened for eligibility using Covidence software following PRISMA reviews' methodology. The quality of RCTs and cross-over RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane review tools.Studies were reviewed by 3 physicians, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. A narrative review of the studies was conducted to identify and synthesize clinical outcomes and safety profile of VADs.ResultsEleven studies (n = 748) were identified: 3 RCTs and 8 open-label prospective studies. Most participants were reproductive-age women with confirmed VO-CPP, diagnosed via imaging or laparoscopy. Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction (MPFF) was the most studied VAD.Pain assessment with VAS scores was the primary endpoint in all studies, with significant benefit in patients consistently demonstrated. Other endpoints included Pelvic Venous Clinical Severity Score (PVCSS) and Pelvic Varicose Vein Questionnaire (PVVQ), with improved symptoms and quality of life. Quantitative outcomes were also reported (reduced pelvic vein diameter; better venous hemodynamics). MPFF was safe, with few adverse events reported. Three RCTs had methodological limitations, with two judged high-risk for bias.ConclusionsWhile many identified studies appear to be of low quality, the consistent beneficial effect on VO-CPP scores and the safety profile observed across all reviewed studies suggest that flavonoids have a positive role in the conservative management of pelvic venous disease (PeVD). Future well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm these findings. In the meantime, flavonoids should be considered a therapeutic option for symptomatic patients with PeVD who are not qualified for, not wishing, or are awaiting intervention.
