Lower limb compensation in adult spinal deformity: can we identify different patterns?
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lower limbs can play a major compensating role for sagittal malalignment; however, little is known about the different types of compensation. This study aimed to identify different patterns of lower limb compensation and to determine which parameters may affect the recruitment of knee flexion versus hip extension. METHODS: This study included adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with full-body X-rays in erect position from a multicentric prospective database. All parameters were measured at baseline: demographics, clinical scores and radiographic parameters: pelvic parameters, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, T1 pelvic angle (TPA), sacro-femoral angle (SFA), knee flexion angle (KA), ankle dorsi-flexion angle (AA), pelvic shift (PSh), hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) grade. A K-means cluster analysis was conducted to identify patterns of lower limb compensation based on SFA and KA. The optimal number of clusters was determined using the silhouette score. The different parameters were then compared across clusters. RESULTS: 871 ASD patients were included, of whom 66.9% were females. Mean age was 62.3±14.6 years, mean BMI was 27.7±5.5 kg.m-2. Four patterns of lower limb compensations were identified: "No compensators", "Recliners" (mainly hip extension), "Squatters" (mainly knee flexion) and "Mixed compensators" (both)."Mixed" and "Squatters" had significantly larger BMI. The proportion of females was the least in the "Squatters" cluster (47.0%) while it was the highest in the "Recliners" group (79.3%) (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with severe hip OA was the lowest in the "Recliners" (38.5%) while it was the highest in the "Squatters" group (71.9%). Knee OA rate was the highest in the"Squatters" group (72.7%). "Mixed compensators" had the greatest PI-LL mismatch (30.4±20.0°) and "No compensators" the lowest (5.3±21.3°). Pelvic incidence values were the highest in "Recliners" and "Mixed compensators" (59.2±13.1° and 57.0±14.1° respectively). TPA values were the highest in the "Mixed compensators" and the lowest in the "No compensators" (33.3±11.7° versus 16.1±11.5°). The "Squatters" presented the significantly poorest values for disability, frailty, and SRS score. CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis determined four types of lower limb compensation:"Recliners" using only hip extension, "Squatters" using only knee flexion,"Mixed compensators" and "No compensators". Lower limb compensatory mechanisms recruitment is multifactorial and varies with age, sex, BMI, frailty, knee and hip OA, pelvic incidence, and spinal alignment.
