An Improved Bayesian Pick-the-Winner (IBPW) Design for Randomized Phase II Clinical Trials. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Phase II clinical trials play a pivotal role in drug development by screening a large number of drug candidates to identify those with promising preliminary efficacy for phase III testing. Trial designs that enable efficient decision-making with small sample sizes and early futility stopping while controlling for type I and type II errors in hypothesis testing, such as Simon's two-stage design, are preferred. Randomized multi-arm trials are increasingly used in phase II settings to overcome the limitations associated with using historical controls as the reference. However, how to effectively balance efficiency and accurate decision-making continues to be an important research topic. A notable development in phase II randomized design methodology is the Bayesian pick-the-winner (BPW) design proposed by Chen et al. [1]. Despite multiple appealing features, this method cannot easily control for overall type I and type II errors for winner selection. Here, we introduce an improved randomized two-stage Bayesian pick-the-winner (IBPW) design that formalizes the winner-selection based hypothesis testing, optimizes sample sizes and decision cut-offs by strictly controlling the type I and type II errors under a set of flexible hypotheses for winner-selection across two treatment arms. Simulation studies demonstrate that our new design offers improved operating characteristics for winner selection while retaining the desirable features of the BPW design.

publication date

  • January 1, 2026

Research

keywords

  • Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Research Design

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC12826356

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1002/sim.70348

PubMed ID

  • 41569686

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 45

issue

  • 1-2