De-escalation strategies for axillary management at primary surgery in early breast cancer: insights and implications for medical oncology practice.

Overview

abstract

The recognition that axillary surgery in early breast cancer primarily serves as a staging tool rather than a curative treatment, along with the shift from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as the standard procedure for clinically node-negative patients, has paved the way for further de-escalation of axillary treatment. This strategy aims to reduce treatment-related morbidity while preserving survival outcomes. Multiple studies have provided compelling evidence that ALND can be safely omitted in cases of limited SLN involvement. Moreover, even the omission of SLNB in selected low-risk cohorts has been shown not to increase recurrence rates. On the other side, from the oncological perspective, research has moved toward an escalation of adjuvant treatments, aiming to reduce recurrence rates and improve overall survival. Thus, while residual axillary disease does not affect patient outcomes, limited axillary staging may hinder access to certain adjuvant therapies. Here, we aim to critically assess the potential impact of recent advances in axillary surgical de-escalation on adjuvant systemic therapy decision-making especially in hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative early breast cancer, with a particular focus on the appropriate selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors, and PARP inhibitors. We argue that decisions on surgical de-escalation should be carefully tailored, balancing its potential benefits with the need for accurate staging to guide adjuvant therapies. A patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach remains essential to ensure that de-escalation does not impact negatively on adjuvant treatment decision making and long-term survival.