The accuracy of double-contrast arthrographic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament. A retrospective review of one hundred and sixty-three knees with surgical confirmation.

Overview

In a retrospective review of 163 knees, the double-contrast arthrogram proved to be an accurate method of evaluating the anterior cruciate ligament. The status of the ligament was examined arthrographically with two stress lateral projections: a horizontal cross-table radiograph and a fluoroscopic spot radiograph. The condition of the ligament was interpreted as being normal, lax but intact, torn with intact synovial tissue, or torn or absent. The status of the ligament was subsequently determined at either arthrotomy or arthroscopy by inspection, palpation, and judgment of the degree of tension under stress. The arthrographic diagnosis was found to be 91.4 per cent accurate within the individual subclassifications and 95 per cent accurate in confirming the ligament to be either intact or abnormal. Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament frequently occurs in association with meniscal tears. In our series, 138 of the 163 knees had either a meniscal or a cruciate lesion, or both. Of these, forty-one (30 per cent) had a meniscal lesion, thirty-four (25 per cent) had a cruciate lesion, and sixty-three (45 per cent) had both. We have found the double-contrast arthrogram to be an accurate method of determining the condition of both the anterior cruciate ligament and the menisci in a single outpatient examination.