Angioplasty or fibrinolysis for acute MI? The GUSTO IIb study. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • The angioplasty substudy of the GUSTO IIb trial confirmed that the short-term results of primary angioplasty are better than those of fibrinolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). In the largest and most rigorous study of this topic performed to date, 9.6% of patients who underwent primary angioplasty either died or suffered a disabling stroke or another myocardial infarction within 30 days, compared with 13.7% of patients who received fibrinolytic therapy, for an odds ratio of 0.67 (P = .033). This difference was less than in previous studies, possibly in part because fibrinolytic therapy has improved. The findings underscore the importance of promptly restoring complete, brisk, antegrade flow in the infarct-related artery, regardless of what treatment is used.

publication date

  • February 1, 1998

Research

keywords

  • Angioplasty
  • Fibrinolytic Agents
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Thrombolytic Therapy

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 0031989652

PubMed ID

  • 9509698

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 65

issue

  • 2