The importance of adjuvant formulation in the development of a tuberculosis vaccine. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • An effective protein-based vaccine for tuberculosis will require a safe and effective adjuvant. There are few adjuvants in approved human vaccines, including alum and the oil-in-water-based emulsions MF59 (Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics), AS03 and AS04 (GlaxoSmithKline Biologics), AF03 (Sanofi), and liposomes (Crucell). When used with pure, defined proteins, both alum and emulsion adjuvants are effective at inducing primarily humoral responses. One of the newest adjuvants in approved products is AS04, which combines monophosphoryl lipid A, a TLR-4 agonist, with alum. In this study, we compared two adjuvants: a stable oil-in-water emulsion (SE) and a stable oil-in-water emulsion incorporating glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant, a synthetic TLR-4 agonist (GLA-SE), each together with a recombinant protein, ID93. Both the emulsion SE and GLA-SE adjuvants induce potent cellular responses in combination with ID93 in mice. ID93/SE induced Th2-biased immune responses, whereas ID93/GLA-SE induced multifunctional CD4(+) Th1 cell responses (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2). The ID93/GLA-SE vaccine candidate induced significant protection in mice and guinea pigs, whereas no protection was observed with ID93/SE, as assessed by reductions in bacterial burden, survival, and pathology. These results highlight the importance of properly formulating subunit vaccines with effective adjuvants for use against tuberculosis.

publication date

  • January 30, 2012

Research

keywords

  • Adjuvants, Immunologic
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis
  • Tuberculosis Vaccines
  • Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC3288309

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84857482098

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.4049/jimmunol.1102696

PubMed ID

  • 22291184

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 188

issue

  • 5