An advisory program for first- and second-year medical students: the Weill Cornell experience. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • PURPOSE: First-year students negotiate new professional culture with a certain amount of excitement and anxiety. There are different approaches for offering guidance. In this study, the authors present Weill Cornell Medical College's experience with an advising program for first- and second-year students. METHODS: Fifty faculty advisors were each assigned 1-3 first-year students who they would follow for 2 years. The responsibilities were outlined to both faculty and students. The program was evaluated using an anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: For the two classes surveyed (2011 and 2012), most students met their advisors once. For both classes, the most frequently discussed issues were general adjustment to medical school, academic life, and the professional life of the advisor. Summer research and career opportunities were also discussed. Most students were satisfied with the advising program. Satisfaction increased with an increase in visits. Most students who did not meet their advisors established an advisor relationship on their own. CONCLUSIONS: An advising program was established at Weill Cornell Medical College that satisfied most of the students. It is important to evaluate its format regularly, from both student and advisor perspectives, in order to ensure its continued success.

publication date

  • November 29, 2013

Research

keywords

  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate
  • Mentors
  • Program Development
  • Students, Medical

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC3844685

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84894374497

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.3402/meo.v18i0.22684

PubMed ID

  • 24290314

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 18