Adherence to self-monitoring healthy lifestyle behaviours through mobile phone-based ecological momentary assessments and photographic food records over 6 months in mostly ethnic minority mothers. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: Mobile phones can replace traditional self-monitoring tools through cell phone-based ecological momentary assessment (CEMA) of lifestyle behaviours and camera phone-based images of meals, i.e. photographic food records (PFR). Adherence to mobile self-monitoring needs to be evaluated in real-world treatment settings. Towards this goal, we examine CEMA and PFR adherence to the use of a mobile app designed to help mothers self-monitor lifestyle behaviours and stress. Design/Setting In 2012, forty-two mothers recorded CEMA of diet quality, exercise, sleep, stress and mood four times daily and PFR during meals over 6 months in Los Angeles, California, USA. SUBJECTS: A purposive sample of mothers from mixed ethnicities. RESULTS: Adherence to recording CEMA at least once daily was higher compared with recording PFR at least once daily over the study period (74 v. 11 %); adherence to both types of reports decreased over time. Participants who recorded PFR for more than a day (n 31) were more likely to be obese v. normal- to overweight and to have higher blood pressure, on average (all P<0·05). Based on random-effects regression, CEMA and PFR adherence was highest during weekdays (both P<0·01). Additionally, PFR adherence was associated with older age (P=0·04). CEMA adherence was highest in the morning (P<0·01). PFR recordings occurred throughout the day. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in population and temporal characteristics should be considered for mobile assessment schedules. Neither CEMA nor PFR alone is ideal over extended periods.

publication date

  • December 4, 2017

Research

keywords

  • Diet
  • Ecological Momentary Assessment
  • Ethnic Groups
  • Ethnicity
  • Feeding Behavior
  • Mothers
  • Patient Compliance
  • Photography

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC5807077

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85038226815

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1017/S1368980017003044

PubMed ID

  • 29199630

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 21

issue

  • 4