Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis: Optimal Tests to Differentiate From Flares.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) is challenging, as features of IA flares can mimic infection. We aimed to cross-sectionally determine if the optimal tests to diagnose PJI in osteoarthritis were present in patients with IA flares. METHODS: We enrolled patients from October 2020 to July 2022 in 3 groups: ( a ) PJI-total joint arthroplasty patients undergoing revision for infection, ( b ) IA Flare-IA patients with a flaring native joint, and ( c ) IA Aseptic-total joint arthroplasty patients with IA undergoing aseptic arthroplasty revision. We compared blood and synovial fluid markers between the cohorts using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests to assess marker sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Of 52 cases overall, 40% had rheumatoid arthritis, 20% psoriatic arthritis, and 11% osteoarthritis (in PJI group). PJI cases had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (%PMN). Alpha-defensin tested positive in 93% of PJI cases, 20% of IA Flares, and 6% of IA Aseptic ( p < 0.01). Synovial white blood cell count >3000/μL and positive alpha-defensin were highly sensitive (100%) in diagnosing infection; however, specificity was 50% for white blood cell counts and 79% for alpha-defensin. PJI diagnosis was nearly 5 times more likely with positive alpha-defensin and almost 6 times more likely with %PMNs >80. Blood markers interleukin-6, procalcitonin, and d -dimer were neither sensitive nor specific, whereas erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP showed 80% sensitivity, but 47% and 58% respective specificities. CONCLUSIONS: Although synovial %PMNs, CRP, and alpha-defensin are sensitive tests for diagnosing PJI, they are less specific and may be positive in IA flares.
