A Deep-Learning Model for Multi-class Audio Classification of Vocal Fold Pathologies in Office Stroboscopy. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a deep-learning classifier trained on voice data extracted from videolaryngostroboscopy recordings, differentiating between three different vocal fold (VF) states: healthy (HVF), unilateral paralysis (UVFP), and VF lesions, including benign and malignant pathologies. METHODS: Patients with UVFP (n = 105), VF lesions (n = 63), and HVF (n = 41) were retrospectively identified. Voice samples were extracted from stroboscopic videos (Pentax Laryngeal Strobe Model 9400), including sustained /i/ phonation, pitch glide, and /i/ sniff task. Extracted audio files were converted into Mel-spectrograms. Voice samples were independently divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and test (10%) by patient. Pretrained ResNet18 models were trained to classify (1) HVF and pathological VF (lesions and UVFP), and (2) HVF, UVFP, and VF lesions. Both classifiers were further validated on an external dataset consisting of 12 UVFP, 13 VF lesions, and 15 HVF patients. Model performances were evaluated by accuracy and F1-score. RESULTS: When evaluated on a hold-out test set, the binary classifier demonstrated stronger performance compared to the multi-class classifier (accuracy 83% vs. 40%; F1-score 0.90 vs. 0.36). When evaluated on an external dataset, the binary classifier achieved an accuracy of 63% and F1-score of 0.48, compared to 35% and 0.25 for the multi-class classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Deep-learning classifiers differentiating HVF, UVFP, and VF lesions were developed using voice data from stroboscopic videos. Although healthy and pathological voice were differentiated with moderate accuracy, multi-class classification lowered model performance. The model performed poorly on an external dataset. Voice captured in stroboscopic videos may have limited diagnostic value, though further studies are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2025.

publication date

  • February 5, 2025

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85217054940

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1002/lary.32036

PubMed ID

  • 39907244