Polycystin-1 loss of function increases susceptibility to atrial fibrillation through impaired DNA damage response.
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney diseases highlights the need for a deeper comprehension of the molecular mechanisms linking them. Mutations in PKD1, the gene encoding Polycystin-1 (PKD1 or PC1), account for 85% of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) cases. This disease often includes cardiac complications such as AF. In cardiomyocytes, PC1 deletion reduces hypertrophic response to pressure overload but promotes baseline ventricular dysfunction, while deletion in fibroblasts ameliorates post-myocardial infarction fibrosis. Despite its known cardiac impact, the role of PC1 in atrial cardiomyocytes and arrhythmias is less understood. Here, we sought to investigate the role of PC1 in AF. METHODS: We used intracardiac programmed stimulation and optical mapping to evaluate AF inducibility in two mouse models, Pkd1 R3277C, which recapitulates human ADPKD progression, and cardiomyocyte-specific Pkd1 deletion, and their respective controls. Isolated adult mouse atrial cardiomyocytes, human iPSC-derived atrial cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-aCM), and HL-1 cells served as in vitro cellular models. Molecular mechanisms were evaluated using optical mapping and molecular and biochemical approaches. RESULTS: Loss-of-function PC1 mutations significantly increased AF susceptibility in vivo and facilitated local reentry in ex vivo left atrial appendages. Comprehensive in vitro experiments supported a direct effect of PC1 in atrial cardiomyocytes. PC1-deficient monolayers exhibited increased arrhythmic events, escalating into reentrant spiral waves post-tachypacing. Transcriptomics analysis revealed PC1-dependent regulation of DNA repair, with PC1 deficiency leading to increased DNA damage under stress. PARP1 inhibitors or nicotinamide riboside, which counteract DNA damage-related metabolic consequences, reduced in vitro arrhythmias PC1-deficient monolayers. Overexpression of the C-terminus of PC1 had the opposite effects in DNA repair genes, suggesting its regulatory effects in atrial cardiomyocytes through retinoblastoma/E2F. Analyses of human atrial tissue from non-ADPKD patients showed reduced levels of mature PC1, suggesting a broader relevance of impaired PC1 in AF. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired PC1 increases in vivo AF inducibility under programmed electrical stimulation and promotes in vitro arrhythmias in hiPSC-aCM and HL-1 cells. Our findings indicate that PC1 protects against DNA damage to reduce AF susceptibility.
